Via Gateway pundit, it seems that the anti-war left seems to be going further and further, just like the energizer bunny. Seems that Cindy Sheehan, the famous anti-war protestor who lost her son in the Iraq war, is now accusing the DOD of treating her poorly when she received her son's body from Iraq. Also seems that many bloggers out there have hit the pavement and done their homework. Gateway can do a much better job of explaining it, so check it out, here. To quote Hawkeye Pearce: "I wonder if she'd speak so loud if she wasn't standing on so many bodies."
Hat tip: Little green footballs, also from Michelle Malkin who got her to open her mouth and spout off on this and give us more of an idea of who she really is. I feel so bad for her son.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
The anti-racist One People's Project website has released her details which the say are publically available on the Internet.
Someone took it a step further and used live.windows.com and yahoo maps to do a Graphic.
Payback's a bitch eh' Malkin?
Her refusal to remove these kids contact information was not from conviction, but from revenue. Every journalist in the world knows that contact information on a press release is for journalists to call for more information or interviews, not to be published (or even pointed out) in the publication itself. If she were any kind of ethical person she would have pulled the information when asked.
If she were something resembling a human being with "feelings", she would not have republished the information once the students themselves removed it. Michelle is a vicious, vindictive, venomous egoist with no discernible ethics nor even a shred of human decency. If she wants to be The Minority Woman Who Believes Minorities and Women Suck, that's her right. But she should at least have the integrity to acknowledge that she has done wrong and to stop compounding the wrong. And she should not give us that disingenuous crap about how she doesn't condone death threats and nobody should misuse her posting and reposting of personal information.
Thanks for your comment, mole, in your comment, you simply solidify the case that we are trying to make reagrding so called liberals who claim to be so tolerant and nice.
First off, you completely ignore the topic of the post that you commented under, allowing us to speculate all day long as to why. Personally, I can come up with a few but we'll leave it there. Secondly, you attack the person (Michelle Malkin in this case) instead of actually engaging in this debate. To be completely honest, I'm not heavily supportive of Michelle, just think she's got some good points.
My counterpart simply points out that the response she has gotten has been beyond hatred and downright racist, anti-woman, and in my opinion, anti-human. The so called caring liberals that email her and harrass her using racial euphemisms, sexual profanity, and death threats, are simply proving the point that they are complete and total hypocrits that have no leg to stand on when it comes to arguing their point.
And then for people like yourself to ignore the post you commented under, and post a comment under the premise: "oh she had it coming", and to quote you: "payback's a bitch", well, you're simply proving our point. Thank you very much.
Post a Comment